POLYFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT

by Unknown

CardiovascularFDA 510kOn market since 2015
80
Low Risk

The POLYFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT by Unknown has a safety score of 80 out of 100, placing it in the low-risk category. Based on FDA MAUDE data, there have been 68 adverse event reports since its introduction in 2015. With an estimated 0 units in use, the incident rate is 0 per 10,000 units. It ranks #87 out of 386 devices in the Cardiovascular category.

Should you be concerned? With a safety score of 80/100, this device has a strong safety profile. The incident rate of 0 per 10,000 units is low, and the number of adverse event reports is proportional to its wide adoption (0 units in use). For most patients, this device carries minimal additional risk.

No recalls have been issued for this device — a positive indicator of manufacturing quality and design safety. On the market since 2015, this device has 11 years of real-world data — enough for long-term safety patterns to emerge.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor About the POLYFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT

1. “What alternatives exist to the POLYFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT?”This device ranks #87 of 386 in the Cardiovascular category. There are 86 devices with better safety scores — ask if any are appropriate for your case.

2. “How many of these have you personally implanted or used?”Surgeon experience with a specific device significantly impacts outcomes. Higher procedure volume correlates with fewer complications.

3. “What are the specific risks for my case?”Overall adverse event rates (0 per 10,000) are averages — your individual risk depends on age, health conditions, and anatomy.

4. “Is there a newer generation of this device available?”The POLYFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT has been on the market since 2015 (11 years). Newer versions may have improved safety profiles based on lessons from earlier models.

Adverse Events

68

Total reports filed with FDA MAUDE

Death Reports

0

Death reports associated with device

Incident Rate

0

Per 10,000 units in use

Recalls

0

No recalls on record

Estimated Units in Use

0

Based on market data estimates

Category Ranking

#87 of 386

In Cardiovascular by safety score

How This Compares

Safety Score80/100
Category Average
67
This Device
80
Best in Category
84

Important Context

Adverse event reports reflect reported incidents, not confirmed device failures. Higher numbers may indicate greater device usage, better reporting systems, or increased awareness. This data should be one factor in your research — always consult your physician.